from Introduction to Human Behavior at the University of Tokyo History of Psychology

  • Wundt (founder of psychology in Germany)
    • Wanted to understand consciousness
    • Approach: Elementism (Structuralism) and Introspection
    • Elementism:
      • Basically, breaking consciousness down into parts and revealing their combinations
        • I also had this image, but on the other hand, what else is there? (blu3mo)
      • Is consciousness a complex of the five senses and simple emotions (pleasure/displeasure, excitement/calmness, tension/relaxation)?
        • Well, this model seems too simple from a modern perspective
    • Introspection
      • Introspection: Subjects reporting their thoughts
      • Tried to conduct experiments and be scientific
        • However, there were inherent limitations to objective observation, so introspection (listening to what subjects had to say) became more common
          • But that’s not really ideal, right? (blu3mo)
  • Psychology developed by criticizing Wundt
    • Similar to what we often see in philosophy (blu3mo)(blu3mo)
    • Gestalt psychology
      • Criticized elementism
      • The whole is not the sum of its parts

        • Huh? (blu3mo)
        • The most important thing is not the individual elements, but the whole (consciousness) that emerges from their combination
          • The claim is that we should focus on the overall phenomena (consciousness) that arise from the combination of elements, rather than understanding each element individually
          • A warning against reducing everything to simple elements (Reductionism)
          • I see~ (blu3mo)(blu3mo)
        • However, well, Germany was heavily affected by WW1/WW2, so it didn’t gain much momentum
          • Instead, the center of psychology (or rather, science) shifted to the United States
    • Behaviorism in the United States
      • Criticized introspection
      • J.B. Watson
      • Psychology must be a science!

        • Science is based on objective data
        • But introspection is not at all objective
      • Emphasized the relationship between stimulus and response
        • Something that Wundt also wanted to do but couldn’t
      • However, this is an incomplete view of science from a modern perspective
        • It’s not just about objectivity (directly observable things), and science doesn’t require it to be present or absent
          • Science has evolved through various efforts~ (blu3mo)
    • Modern times
      • Neo-behaviorism
        • Classical behaviorism: Stimulus -> Response
        • Neo-behaviorism: Stimulus -> Organism -> Response
          • By considering the mechanisms of organisms, we can understand more things by doing behaviorism, right? (blu3mo)