• https://synodos.jp/opinion/society/27796/
    • After reading this, I thought it was a good aspect of the process of taking exams that we can have discussions like this (blu3mo)
      • Even if the university refuses to accept the answer, we can still have discussions like this because the entrance exam center defines a clear “correct answer”.
    • It can also be said that there is falsifiability.
      • Since the truth is not determined, can we really call it falsifiability?
      • Well, at least it is easier to have discussions about the evaluation methods.
    • Does this mean that when test takers are evaluated based on clear criteria, the evaluation process itself becomes easier to evaluate?
  • On the other hand, with “holistic” evaluations like college admissions in the United States, it becomes difficult to do that. #entrance exams