Fractal Summarizer Plurality Feedback 20240420

Based on the following considerations:

• I want to think about how to divide the text into lines, which is the smallest unit of segmentation.
  • Simply breaking the text with line breaks can sometimes lead to undesirable segmentation.

From [Social Hack Day #60 Chat First Half](https://scrapbox.io/plurality-japanese/Social Hack Day#60雑談前半)

Fractal Summary §

(Claude)

• During the session after the lunch break, the mechanism of the Fractal Summary developed by blu3mo was introduced and tested by the participants.
  • Fractal Summary is a tool that gradually summarizes the text, allowing readers to delve deeper into parts that interest them.
  • Participants provided feedback on the quality and clarity of the summaries.
  • The need for additional information to complement the content of the text was also discussed.

I would like to know the impressions of using the [page that connects all the contents of the Fractal Summary], or the reasons why motivation did not arise! (blu3mo)

• I am curious about what you found valuable or not valuable (blu3mo)

Impressions of the [page that connects all the contents of the Fractal Summary] (healthy-sato)

• On a screen displaying summaries, I wanted to read a Japanese translation without a summary (imagining it as a column between Summary 4 and the original text).
• Ideally, if there was a way to navigate to the corresponding Scrapbox page and make it easier to write impressions after reading…
  • I resolved this by splitting the screen
  • 
• Mentioning the positioning of each chapter at around Summary Level 1-2 might increase readability?
  • 
  • I see (blu3mo)(blu3mo)
    • It seems that the structure of the Summary around levels 1-2 is not good, so I want to improve it (blu3mo)

I might concentrate for about 1 Pomodoro and try reading the Fractal Summary… (nishio)

• The emphasis is on the intersection of individual and group identities, suggesting that digital technology should aim to utilize diversity to develop.

  • I was curious about ”the intersection of individual and group identities”, so I delved into it and found the following summary
  • I wrote about this on the page ”the intersection of individual and group identities”
    • I thought it was nice to have phrases like this that can be kept as a single concept in Scrapbox
  • I would like an explanation page and icon for ”Fractal Summary”

• Oliver Wendell Holmes stated that the greatest value of civilization is to complicate the means of living and make a richer life possible, while Carlo Rovelli explains that reality is not a collection of things but a network of processes. Technocracy and libertarianism are rooted in science, and the approach of ⿻ that emphasizes complexity, emergence, and multilayered organization offers a new perspective on social systems.

  • 
    • There is too much difference in content, which confused me
    • The summary here is not very pleasant
    • Perhaps the problem lies in the original text being too fragmented due to significant leaps in the story…

• John Dewey stated that the new public must destroy the old political forms, while pioneers like Henry George, Georg Simmel, and Norbert Wiener presented a vision of a ”connected society” that utilizes the potential for cooperation beyond diversity.

  • 
  • Hmm, the leaps are…
  • Maybe in terms of implementation, levels 3 and 4 are just operating in parallel with different input ranges, but as a user, I expect there to be continuity between 3 and 4
    • I see (blu3mo)(blu3mo)- Should 3 take 4 as input, or should 4 take 3 as input, or perhaps repeat the process of comparing them several times…

• J.C.R. Licklider argues that decisions regarding the advancement and use of computer technology should not only be for the public interest but also to provide a means for the public to participate in the decision-making process that shapes the future.

  • Suddenly thought, “It would be interesting to gather these kinds of arguments and create a Polis.”
    • So, make it possible to jump from each question to each chapter.

• 

  • There are a lot of references to Luna (a fictional character), huh?
    • 
      • Ah, I see.
      • Mistakenly treating multiple line breaks as separate paragraphs.
      • Perhaps implement a process to combine them up to a certain length if they are too short?
      • Or maybe use the data converted from PDF into content per page that I have on hand?