-
- Mr. Izawa’s book review
-
We are unnecessarily bound by something that is only a tool for synchronization.
- Well, are there any other reasons besides synchronization?
- If something has a linear relationship with physical time, then physical time is useful for its management and estimation.
- For example, distance traveled or progress of work.
Physical time and alienation, constraints from /collab/20210313MTG
-
In an online event, if we insert a video lecture of someone who cannot attend the live session between the live speakers, and in the video they refer to the live session by saying “as the previous speaker mentioned,” it is accurate and even more vivid than the live session. 😮 The barrier of space has melted, and the barrier of time is also melting away.
-
@[[rkmt]] [October 25, 2020](https://twitter.com/rkmt/status/1320398003702673409?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) -
Another example of melting the barriers of space and time: prepare a lecture video in advance and play it during a live session while responding to chat questions from participants. Watch your own presentation from the outside while doing something else in parallel. (At a conference called WISS, we have been conducting conferences in a chat + lecture format for about 20 years).
- “Melting the barrier of time”
-
In that case, the biggest barrier is the “barrier of time”.. Time differences are tough 😵 It would be nice if live sessions could be archived and watched later, and if the Q&A session could be transcribed. If we can look back on such records 10 years later, it becomes lifelogging of conferences.
-
@[[rkmt]] [May 14, 2021](https://twitter.com/rkmt/status/1393003193307566082?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) -
With IT, we should be able to free ourselves from the constraints of time and space, but because the perception of the users who use it is bound by constraints, it ends up creating something inconvenient instead.
-
@[[kaityo256]] [May 31, 2020](https://twitter.com/kaityo256/status/1266962469466988544?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)