I asked someone to read Polymorphic Reality - Towards a Smoothly Connected Subjective Metaverse and provide criticism of it. Here are some possible criticisms that were found:
- It assumes that reality can be manipulated or customized based on individual preferences or needs, which may be seen as naive realism or idealism. This perspective ignores the objective or independent nature of reality¹².
- It overlooks the social and cultural aspects of reality, such as shared norms, values, and meanings that are negotiated by different groups or communities. These aspects may not be easily changed or replaced by individual choices or technologies³.
- It may lead to confusion or alienation among people with different or incompatible views or experiences of reality. This could hinder effective and authentic communication or cooperation³.
These criticisms were sourced from conversations and articles such as “Peircean Polymorphism: Between Realism and Anti-realism”¹, “I’m Agonizing over My Naive Realism”², and “A critique of Baudrillard’s hyperreality: towards a sociology of…”³.
In response to this, someone commented “それはそう” (That’s true) [^blu3mo].