-
When Myself says that they are interested in HCI, it seems that they are particularly interested in this.
- The interaction between humans and computers is just one theme to consider when thinking about models.
- Software development is just one means of implementation. (Application of technology as a means)
-
I still don’t fully understand it yet.
- However, out of all the attempts I’ve made to generalize my interests, this one seems to fit the best.
- So, I want to deepen my understanding of this.
-
It’s like going back and forth between these two, I imagine. (Going Back and Forth between Abstraction and Concreteness)
- Implementing something that cannot be explained by traditional models.
-
Exploring areas that cannot be reached through abstract thinking by trial and error in concrete implementation.
- Trying to reach places that can’t be reached by imagination alone through prototyping.
- The process of creating Eva also seems to have the same idea of using real objects to find angles that cannot be found by imagination.
-
Ah, I quoted the same story from Mathematical Girl on the Definition page (blu3mo).
- This might have been one of the sources of my thoughts.
- I want to talk about how similar things can be done in fields other than mathematics.
-
Is this more of an abstract discussion?
-
- Implementing something that cannot be explained by traditional models.
-
This can be summarized as “creating a Palmacon and deconstructing it” (blu3mo)(blu3mo)(blu3mo).
-
Specifically, here are some examples I imagine.
- The research on the self-actualization by (drinami) (not sure if I understand it correctly)#embodiment theory
- Implementing something new that cannot be explained by previous models (concrete).
- Based on the knowledge gained, thinking about a new and more versatile model of the body (abstract).
- A clear example is the research on adding extra arms with a robot arm called Metalimbs, which expands the definition of the body and considers a model with multiple hands.
- Something like that?
- I don’t know how much they are thinking about these things, but at least I am interested in them (blu3mo).
- Is this also what they want to do with the Exploration of Virtual Time?
- A new model of human’s sense of time, perhaps?
- No, I don’t think that’s the ultimate goal (blu3mo).
- It’s still about exploring new models through implementation, right? (#6113582479e11300007c1d31)
- Rethinking the concepts of “human” and “consciousness” considering AI that behaves like humans.
- The content of University of Tokyo 1S Law and Society
- Reconstructing “legal theory” considering the evolution of computer media.
- The research on the self-actualization by (drinami) (not sure if I understand it correctly)#embodiment theory
-
Achieving the goals of science through an engineering approach, something like that?
- No, the purpose is not to “uncover the truth,” but rather to imagine things that emerge from setting rules, so in the end, it’s about engineering (blu3mo).
-
Miscellaneous
-
Previous title: “Philosophy of Moving Hands”
- I didn’t think it was really philosophy.
-
Exploring philosophical themes while implementing experiences by moving hands.
- Themes like what it means to be human, what the body is, what reality is, what knowledge is, what computers are, what media is, etc.
- Is there no term that refers to this kind of research?
-
Related but slightly different topic: Ideas Are Easier to Convey When Accompanied by Implementation
-
(tkgshn) as a media artist#mediaart
- (blu3mo) Media artists focus more on art as the main outcome, right?
- Artists who are currently in the spotlight probably just want to implement concepts in society (tkgshn)
- But there are no good words (or it takes time for them to catch on), so they express them visually (tkgshn)
- Is a physical tool necessary for philosophical expression (questioning)? It’s not just about that (tkgshn)(tkgshn)(tkgshn)(tkgshn)
- Is “Philosophy of Moving Hands” different from “Philosophy of Moving Thoughts”? (tkgshn)- Knowledge must be verified through practice (tkgshn)