Desiring to Attain a Mode of Thinking with Concrete Issues as the Protagonist

from nztm 20240831

I want to adopt a thinking mode that focuses on specific challenges as the protagonist:

• From specific A to abstract to specific B, I am following this process.
  • In terms of fractals, I am following this process:
    • Specific A “I want to read articles quickly” → Abstract “To understand articles quickly, a fractal-like user interface might be helpful”
    • Abstract “To understand articles quickly, a fractal-like user interface might be helpful” → Specific B “It’s cumbersome to read online meeting minutes” and “It’s cumbersome to read news articles”
      • 9 I’m tired, so I want to organize the assumptions and verifications of the hypothesis or something similar.
    • However, just going back and forth once may not lead to a perfect fit.
      • From here, after considering challenges like “It’s cumbersome to read online meeting minutes” and “It’s cumbersome to read news articles,” create a moderately abstracted solution again.
    • By repeating such loops, I thought that the accuracy would gradually improve (blu3mo).
• This indicates the need for thinking that does not primarily focus on “abstract” but rather on “concrete.”
  • My current approach to fractal summaries:
    • It involves a protagonist centered on the abstraction “To understand articles quickly, a fractal-like user interface might be helpful,” aiming to find a good match in specific details.
      • I believe 9 I’m tired, so I want to organize the assumptions and verifications of the hypothesis reflects this.
  • Instead, I thought it might be better to place “specific” as the protagonist and then expand the thinking towards abstraction.
• I want to be able to switch to such a thinking mode by metacognition.