(Note: I’m writing this casually based on my knowledge.)

  • I’m interested in the part about “Improving the Mechanism Rather Than Hitting Water.”

  • What does it mean for a situation to have no bugs?

    • It means that Human bugs are covered.
    • It means that the majority’s wishes are being fulfilled.
      • Maybe when evaluating politics, there are “ideals (objectives)” and “competence (ability to achieve objectives),” but I think only the latter is the focal point.
    • It’s difficult to draw a line between “objectives,” “bugs,” and “system.”
      • Because a specific political system may be the objective, or the reason for having objectives may be a bug.
  • Type 1 (given after the name)

    • It’s like populist politics or something.
    • It’s about having the wrong parameters in elections.
    • These explanations make sense, but they don’t explain the current political situation.
      • If these bugs are significant, there should be a situation like “someone skilled at talking evades the issue of the coronavirus in press conferences, and the public doesn’t notice.”
        • Hasn’t it become like that? I wonder.
  • Type 2

    • The media (referred to as the fourth estate) is not integrated into the system.
    • This explanation seems to fit the current situation.
  • Type 3