I'm not good at interfering with others when I'm not sure if I'm right

• I think the concerns about Myself in interpersonal (vs. mass) relationships can be largely attributed to the following:

• Specifically, the move that I thought I couldn’t make:

  • Around the point where I fully understood, confidently communicate about its content, etc.
    • It is often said to be generally not good in the surrounding community, but I think it’s somewhat good up to a certain extent.
    • Also, regardless of whether it is actually “good” or not, in most cases, doing this will be highly valued by others on social media.
      • Doctor Google Mentor Quackery
    • related: An environment where people who can confidently communicate benefit

• What is “correct”:

  • Whether it results in happiness for oneself or the other person, based on facts or interference.
  • I should consider the latter, but I feel like I’m often bound by the former.
    • The latter is more difficult to evaluate in advance.

• Causes:

  • Some people may see others who are good at it and think, “I’m not good at it.”
  • Theory that I’m not good at believing “I am right.”
  • Theory that I’m not good at taking the risk of interfering with others when I’m not sure if I am right.
    • (blu3mo) I think this might be it.

• /nishio/自分が正しいか分からない

• Or, it may appear to be a different concept because Nishio thinks that information dissemination and interference are separate.

  • I see.
  • /villagepump/見てもいい I feel like (blu3mo) thinks that information dissemination is separate from interference.
    • Scrapbox seems to be suitable for that kind of thing.
    • #見てもいい